8.7 C
New York
Thursday, November 13, 2025

Bitcoin as Economic Infrastructure: Rethinking Fair Value

By Richard Edwards, Senior Lecturer in Financial Systems and Emerging Technologies


Bitcoin has long outgrown its early narrative as a speculative curiosity. While some still see it as digital gold or a tech novelty, those paying closer attention recognize something deeper: Bitcoin is becoming infrastructure—a neutral, open-source foundation for global value exchange.

When we assess fair value through that lens, the question changes. It’s no longer “What is Bitcoin worth in today’s market?” but rather, “What is the value of a protocol that enables borderless, censorship-resistant settlement?”

In this article, I’ll walk you through how we frame Bitcoin not just as a commodity or asset—but as a base layer protocol—and how our fair value model helps us measure its maturation.


🧩 Bitcoin Is a Monetary Network, Not a Company

Traditional asset valuation relies on future cash flows, revenues, or earnings. Bitcoin, by design, has none of those. It doesn’t produce yield. It doesn’t report quarterly. It doesn’t expand its balance sheet.

Instead, its value stems from:

  • Its predictable, algorithmic monetary policy
  • The security and costliness of its consensus mechanism
  • Its ability to support settlement finality without trusted intermediaries

Much like TCP/IP underpins the internet, Bitcoin is becoming an invisible-but-essential protocol for programmable money. Its fair value must be assessed on the strength of its network usage and resilience.


🧠 Modeling Fair Value with Power Laws

At the core of our fair value methodology lies a power-law function, reflective of how decentralized networks grow. As adoption scales, the utility of the system doesn’t grow linearly—it compounds.

We apply a two-factor formula: FVt=A⋅Stα+B⋅DtβFV_t = A \cdot S_t^\alpha + B \cdot D_t^\betaFVt​=A⋅Stα​+B⋅Dtβ​

Where:

  • StS_tSt​: Cumulative Bitcoin supply at time ttt
  • DtD_tDt​: Proxy for demand (e.g., active addresses, transactions, UTXO age distribution)
  • A,B,α,βA, B, \alpha, \betaA,B,α,β: Empirical coefficients refined over historical epochs

This model reflects Bitcoin’s long-term value trajectory, driven by its scarcity schedule and network participation—not speculative cycles.


🔄 Infrastructure Layers Take Time to Be Recognized

In the early days of the internet, protocols like HTTP and SMTP were considered niche innovations. They weren’t widely valued—until entire industries emerged atop them. Bitcoin is undergoing a similar arc.

When we see the fair value curve diverge from market price, it often reflects temporal misalignment—between where the network is going and how the market currently perceives it.

As more developers, sovereign entities, institutions, and individuals build upon or adopt Bitcoin, the underlying infrastructure becomes more robust. That robustness, in turn, supports a higher fair value baseline.


📉 What Fair Value Can—and Can’t—Do

Let me be clear: this model is not a trading signal. It won’t tell you if Bitcoin will rise or fall next week. What it does offer is a framework to:

  • Gauge maturity: Are we in a period of rational consolidation or euphoric overreach?
  • Identify dislocations: When price strays too far from fair value, mean reversion often follows
  • Anchor narratives: Amid hype cycles and media panic, fundamentals offer clarity

In a space prone to emotional extremes, that clarity is powerful.


🔐 Bitcoin’s Value Is in What It Replaces

Bitcoin doesn’t need marketing departments or lobbyists to grow. It grows because it replaces something costly, inefficient, or untrustworthy:

  • Instead of a clearinghouse: use Bitcoin
  • Instead of a capital control workaround: use Bitcoin
  • Instead of trusting a third party to secure savings: use Bitcoin

Each of these use cases contributes to its fair value—quietly, incrementally, and irreversibly.


🔎 Final Thoughts

We don’t price bridges based on how many people walk across them in a single day. We value them based on what they enable over years. Bitcoin deserves the same treatment.

Fair value modeling, then, isn’t a gimmick. It’s a way of seeing the protocol for what it truly is: a monetary rail—growing stronger, more efficient, and more integral to the financial fabric of the 21st century.

As always, price may tell you what’s happening.
But fair value? That tells you why.

Richard Edwards
Richard Edwards
Senior Lecturer in Financial Systems and Emerging Technologies Richard Edwards is a seasoned academic and thought leader in the intersection of economics, cryptography, and decentralized networks. With over 25 years of experience in financial modeling and systems theory, he currently serves as a senior lecturer and guest advisor at several research institutions focused on digital assets and blockchain infrastructure. Richard holds a Ph.D. in Applied Mathematics from the University of Edinburgh and spent much of his early career advising central banks on monetary simulations and complex systems. His work now centers on understanding Bitcoin not just as a financial instrument, but as a living, networked system with measurable fundamentals. He is the principal contributor to the Bitcoin Fair Value Model, a methodology grounded in power-law theory, network effect metrics, and long-term supply constraints. When he’s not teaching or writing, Richard enjoys mentoring graduate students in cryptoeconomics, and can often be found sketching models on a chalkboard with contagious enthusiasm. “We don’t just watch Bitcoin’s price. We trace its heartbeat.” — R. Edwards

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay Connected

239FansLike
796FollowersFollow

Latest Articles